Showing posts with label Disney.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Disney.. Show all posts

Tuesday

Pirates Cutting Corners


When Rob Marshall shepherds his cast on the latest pirates of the Caribbean installment; he will do so with a budget cut by a third in comparison to the Gore Verbinski had for the last installment, due to the scaling down that Disney chairman Rich Ross is putting in place.

The LA Times blames the an increase the cost of making movies and its ‘stunning’ effects over the money that a movie can generate at the box office and dvd sales.. [Cynically we await the announcement that Stranger Tides will under take the cheaper post production 3D convert that will see ticket prices hiked]  

However, this may just be a blessing in disguise for the project. After all, the sequels to the enjoyable original have felt over bloated with countless plot lines and special effects. So if the scale down means that screenwriters Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio have to sharpen up there script in terms of characterization over spectacle we may find ourselves with a better Pirates films than we otherwise envisaged.  

MATT RICHARDSON

Pixar Announce Monster's Inc II

Toy Story 3 is set to christen cinemas worldwide shortly, but as but as always Pixar are hard at work on their upcoming developments and have delighted us with the announcement that a sequel to the 2001 feature Monster's Inc is officially being released November 16,  2012.

Disney Chairman Rich Ross did not reveal any details which like Toy Story will be kept under wraps to build and fester anticipation to a much loved Pixar classic. But with a release date set it means that these busy bees have being working on its development for some time now, yet Ross did not give any mention to an attached director, with original director Pete Doctor denying his involvement at the round of press junkets for UP; but that was before it was green lit officially of course.

This was not the only news to grace from the Disney/Pixar coalition with the sequel will be the second of two films released by the studio that year with the announcement of Brave, formerly titled The Bear And The Bow and is described as Pixar's first fairytale.

Brenda Chapman is in the directing chair for this one, with vocals being provided by Reese Witherspoon voicing a Scottish princess whose headstrong ambitions put her family in danger. June 15th,  2012 for this one.

MATT RICHARDSON

Saturday

Maleficent Finds Its Queen?

We reported last week that Disney were pushing ahead with Alice in Wonderland scribe Linda Woolverton to manifest ‘Maleficent’; the retelling of Sleeping Beauty from the perspective of the titular evil queen. Now rumours stemming from the LA Times place Angelina Jolie as the main contender for the starring lead.

Tim Burton is still currently linked to the project, yet he has remained allusive to signing onto any deals post Alice, with Maleficient one of many possibles.

Nothing is concrete for the moment, but Jolie is reportedly actively following its development. However, It is understood that Jolie [currently to be seen alongside Johnny Depp in the  ‘The Tourist’] may only sign on with the condition that Burton himself is involved as director.

Jolie’s move to Disney would certainly raise eyebrows, if not of only the dad’s taking their young ones to the theatre, certainly the mothers who suddenly want to know why they are not in their customary leaned back, feet up position watching the world go by on a Sunday afternoon. 

Yet, the move would be a benefit for Disney as it would be snaring a 'movie star' very much at the top of the list and at the top of her game. And for Jolie it could potentially bring a more rounded audience view of the star, who is seen more of a dark temptress of Hollywood, rather than an actress.

With the script only just kicking into development, it is safe to say the project is one for the future; so a commitment by Burton could coincide with him working on Dark Shadows or The Addams Family that he is currently circling first.


Sunday

Review: The Princess and the Frog

Walt Disney classics are just that, defined by their place in a different generation, confined to history. Pixar, have stolen a march on the old master, creating the types of stories that a new Walt Disney generation must delve backwards to discover; The Jungle Book, Sleeping Beauty, and the Lion King are just three possible examples.

However, as The Princess and the Frog plays before your eyes, you would be forgiven in thinking that you had stepped back to the golden era of Disney. Legendary animation writer-directors Ron Clements and John Musker (The Little Mermaid and Aladdin) have delved into the richness of previous Disney’s releases to produce a fresh and vibrant old-fashioned fairy tale, but set in a modern mould. The aesthetics of the film are impeccable handled and beautifully envisioned using a combination of hand-drawn animation and digital polishing, to bring to life a contender to any other recent animated release.

It is New Orleans in the 1920’s, Prince Naveen has been turned into a frog; our heroine Tiana, believing a kiss would restore him to his stately figure, is also cursed. In order to find a cure, our now amphibious duo must journey through the swarming swamp to find a legendary voodoo witch Mama Odie.

Clements and Musker do not alienate Disney’s latest picture from the roots of instilled its creator. The customary staples are still present:  we have our photogenic heroine, the handsome prince, the unsightly villains and even a fairy god mother, well, kind of.  And not to mention the comic relieve in the form of imaginative excess: a large crocodile who desires nothing more than to plays Jazz.

Spectacle is added through the intersection of storyline and the accustomed song and dance fare. Randy Newman (Toy Story) provides a score that buoys the picture, flowing effortless complimenting, or even enhancing the film; ‘Friend’s on the Other Side’ is truly hallucinogenic. The mixture delivers a resounding endorsement to the Disney ‘brand’ of feature, still having a place amongst modern animated cinema.
But, it is the subtle differences embedded in The Princess and the Frog that allow it to stand up against its precedents.

For a start, in heroine Tiana (Dreamgirls’ Anika Noni Rose) we are led into a characterisation of feminine determination and responsibility; a drive that sees’ her occupy two jobs simultaneously in order to achieve her ambition of opening a restaurant – does that sound like any Disney classic you’ve heard  of? But it rings in true within the context of a modern audience. And the fact that Roses’ Tiana is the first portrayal of an African-American lead in a Disney feature should not be lost in translation. Change is signposted continually.

To emphasise this transition Tiana’s opposite, Prince Naveen, is handsome, loveable and utterly helpless; surviving off the name of a lost generation with no inclination to take responsibility himself. In this film the lead characters’ have flaws, with the themes of wealth and ambition countered with the importance of love and family; a staple that transcends the old, and the new generation Disney.

With the addition of delightfully crafted support characters, such as the air headed best-friend (Jennifer Cody), Louis the jazz playing alligator, Southern firefly (Jim Cummings), and the delightfully demonic Dr. Facilier (Keith David), a villainous foe worthy of any nightmare, what you are left with is The Princess and the Frog: the return of Disney.

The Princess and the Frog delivers; even it may not surpass the older generation classics. Still, it is a vast improvement on the recent output from Walt Disney, combining old staples with vibrancy and a modern re-imagining, to create a fresh enjoyable old-fashioned fairytale with heart.   

Verdict:
****
MATT RICHARDSON

Tuesday

Disney Launches Tron Legacy

Disney finally release first official look to Tron Legacy, sequel to the 1982 cult classic. With anticipation festering; Disney's decision to hold off releasing footage saw pirated copies and descriptions spill over servers. Now in high definition; it is here.

The ‘bridge’ over the 25-year gap is established immediately, with Sam Flynn, son to the original’s Tom attempting to track down his lost father; leading him to TRON.

Visually the trailer delivers; transporting the viewer from the mundane present day, to the futuristic neon lit crispness of TRON. It is certainly comparable to the early visuals produced for new 3D ‘wonderland’s’, Avatar and Alice.

A main talking point from the trailer is, of course, the return of Jeff Bridges as Flynn. Impressively, he returns in two incarnations of himself; the elder statesman, and as his younger incarnation from the original.These effects have been produced using the CGI techniques seen in X men: The Last Stand and Benjamin Button.  

It is only glimpse, though a promising one, but with the December release date looming, work remains to be done to deliver.
MATT RICHARDSON

The Uplifting Rise of Pixar



In 1986, Apple co-founder Steve Jobs bought a little known graphics division of Lucasfilm Ltd valued surplus to requirements, the $10 Million acquisition established itself as an independent company and was christened Pixar. With the release of the studio's tenth feature film 'UP' it would be easy to say the rest was history, but, it would serve only to undermine the most influential producer of cinematic development of the last two decades.

Pixar's early output consisted of televised commercials, with the revenue used to fund their development of a new frontier medium, animation. Distinction shortly followed in 1987 with the animated short Luxo Jr, which received an Academy Award nomination for Best Animated Short Film. This achievement was to be surpassed, with Tin Toy scooping the famous golden statuette two years later, providing an early glimpse of their future success.

Following Pixar's early achievements their profile rose within the industry, leading to a partnership with Walt Disney Studios to be forged in 1991. This agreement with Disney, gave the Pixar team the required license to develop, produce and distribute three feature-length films. Fulfilling, co-founders John Lasseter and Dr. Ed Catmul's early ambition to bring animation to the big screen.

In 1995, Pixar did not disappoint with their first feature film Toy Story setting the bar to an unprecedented high. The feature, not only produced a 'never seen before' medium pioneered by themselves, but also offered audiences an effortless combination of spectacle and entertainment, a future staple of Pixar's later releases.

Set in a fantastical world where unknown by humans, toys come to life, Toy Story, introduces the adventures of a wide collection of toys owned by child Andy. Beginning with Woody, an old-fashioned American cowboy doll, who acts as community leader to the rest, becoming anxious at the thought of being shelved by all, for a popular new toy, space ranger Buzz Lightyear.

With this release Pixar were forever etched in cinematic history as the producers of the first fully computer animated feature film, and proceeded to become the highest grossing film of the year.

Pixar's influence in the development of cinema over the last two decades is definitive; they opened the door to limitless possibility. They showed the potential to create new worlds, new perspectives, and importantly produce new ambitious stories never thought possible. Indeed, since their breakthrough in full-feature animation there has been substantial increases in the output of animated feature films from other studios. However, while others strive to make an impact, none have been able to match the pioneers of this 
medium.

Not restricted to an influence only in the development of animated films, Pixar's presence is felt in live action. Without their vast contribution, the ability to bring the now seamless combination of live action and animated special effects to features films such Lord of the Rings trilogy would not exist. The visual results simply would not have produced without the continual effort to push the boundaries of possibility with animation.

What has caused Pixar's unrivalled success? Are Pixar on the crest of a lucky streak that has produced one box-office hit after another with their releases Finding Nemo, The Incredibles, and Wall E. Or, is their success born from the driving ambition to be the pinnacle of animation? Whereby in search of progress, risk, it appears, has become apart of their nature. With an unwillingness to settle on their previous successes, they instead, continue to endeavor towards innovation.

This is unique; the rise of Pixar in recent cinema history has come at a moment where originality amongst large studios has declined. Now, a notable increase of the money-spinning series is evident. The 'Adaptation Franchise', has become a mainstay of cinema, with the titles X men, Spiderman, Harry Potter, currently representing thirteen films alone that rank among the highest box office earners of the last decade. With even more franchises, sequels, and even reboots of releases continuing down the production line, this is a trend that is unlikely to stop.

Still, this criticism is not directed towards these films, many have their own merits, as well as flaws. But, the criticism is more precisely levied to the gradual increase of sequels are being put into production because it is an easier to attain larger audiences on the name of a loved original, than generating a new innovative in a story.

Consequently, this has produced a production line focused on a quick turnover of films, with the need to 'strike while the iron hot', before audiences lose interest. Acting in this way, considerations are often rushed leading to the detriment of a production. Issues with schedule conflicts impacting on returning directors, and incomplete scripts, have reportedly caused havoc on recent disjointed big budget releases. Despite the obvious impact, a release date appears to now outweigh the end product.

In contrast, Pixar will currently invest three years into each release, spending an equal time on developing possible ideas, as some productions enter and complete an entire film. This method can be lead back to what co founder John Lasseter believes in most important “world, character and story”. Only when the idea is right, and the creative spark is lit within the team, will a project progress onto story development. From here, new worlds are created and explored, new characters are born, and their stories and relationships unfolded. In the simplest sense, this is the heart of Pixar's first twenty years of film-making with animation playing its helping hand in bringing these worlds to life for all to see.

It is this devotion to each Pixar project that brings the most out of their visions, and the direct source executing with such consistency. A release date is not greater than the project, and profitable franchises do not steal focus. Instead, Pixar push the boundaries of storytelling, shifting between fantasy and real-life, portraying the impacts of love, tragedy, and dreams in their adventurous worlds, with the added relationships that happen along the way.

Where next for Pixar? Audiences must surely hope that they follow in their own frontier footsteps of the last two decades, and continue to set the bar to 'infinity and beyond'.